True-to-Size Millimeter Sizing Comparison

UGG Ansley vs UGG Classic Short II

Detailed size conversion chart, cavity measurements in millimeters, and crowd-sourced fit advice for choosing your perfect size.

Shoe Awomen
4.0(8,435 reviews)
Fit TendencyRuns Small (-4mm)
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Ansley Breakdown
5.0(17,044 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Classic Short II Breakdown
Fit Verdict

Classic Short II Runs Slightly Larger

The Classic Short II provides about 4mm more internal length than the Ansley. We suggest ordering 1/2 size down in Classic Short II.

Length Delta+4 mm
Width DeltaIdentical

Interactive Size Converter

Select what size you wear in the Ansley to see your calculated size in the Classic Short II.

Recommended Size in UGG Classic Short II
US 7.5100% Match

Internal shoe cavity difference: 0.0 mm (snugger)

Complete Size Conversion Matrix

Direct millimeter-calibrated mapping comparing all available sizes between both shoes.

Ansley (US)Internal CavityClassic Short II EquivalentMatch AccuracyFit Difference
US 4.5229 mmUS 4.553%+4.0 mm
US 5233 mmUS 4.5100%0.0 mm
US 5.5236 mmUS 588%+1.0 mm
US 6239 mmUS 5.588%+1.0 mm
US 6.5243 mmUS 6100%0.0 mm
US 7246 mmUS 6.588%+1.0 mm
US 7.5249 mmUS 788%+1.0 mm
US 8253 mmUS 7.5100%0.0 mm
US 8.5256 mmUS 888%+1.0 mm
US 9263 mmUS 8.565%-3.0 mm
US 9.5266 mmUS 988%+1.0 mm
US 10269 mmUS 9.588%+1.0 mm
US 10.5273 mmUS 10100%0.0 mm
US 11276 mmUS 10.588%+1.0 mm

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the Ansley size compare to the Classic Short II?

The Classic Short II provides about 4mm more internal length than the Ansley. We suggest ordering 1/2 size down in Classic Short II. The Ansley has an internal fit offset of -4mm compared to 0mm for the Classic Short II.

Do these shoes fit wide feet comfortably?

The Ansley has a standard medium width profile, while the Classic Short II is standard medium.