True-to-Size Millimeter Sizing Comparison

PUMA Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH vs PUMA Touring Low

Detailed size conversion chart, cavity measurements in millimeters, and crowd-sourced fit advice for choosing your perfect size.

4.0(286 reviews)
Fit TendencyRuns Large (+4mm)
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH Breakdown
4.0(216 reviews)
Fit TendencyRuns Large (+4mm)
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Touring Low Breakdown
Fit Verdict

True to Size Comparison

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both.

Length Delta0 mm
Width DeltaIdentical

Interactive Size Converter

Select what size you wear in the Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH to see your calculated size in the Touring Low.

Recommended Size in PUMA Touring Low
US 10.5100% Match

Internal shoe cavity difference: 0.0 mm (snugger)

Complete Size Conversion Matrix

Direct millimeter-calibrated mapping comparing all available sizes between both shoes.

Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH (US)Internal CavityTouring Low EquivalentMatch AccuracyFit Difference
US 7271 mmUS 7100%0.0 mm
US 7.5274 mmUS 7.5100%0.0 mm
US 8277 mmUS 8100%0.0 mm
US 8.5281 mmUS 8.5100%0.0 mm
US 9284 mmUS 9100%0.0 mm
US 9.5287 mmUS 9.5100%0.0 mm
US 10291 mmUS 10100%0.0 mm
US 10.5294 mmUS 10.5100%0.0 mm
US 11297 mmUS 11100%0.0 mm
US 11.5301 mmUS 11.5100%0.0 mm
US 12304 mmUS 12100%0.0 mm
US 12.5307 mmUS 12.5100%0.0 mm
US 13311 mmUS 13100%0.0 mm
US 14317 mmUS 14100%0.0 mm

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH size compare to the Touring Low?

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both. The Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH has an internal fit offset of 4mm compared to 4mm for the Touring Low.

Do these shoes fit wide feet comfortably?

The Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH has a standard medium width profile, while the Touring Low is standard medium.